home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: amtrash.comlink.de!J_Plewka
- From: J_Plewka@Amtrash.comlink.de (Joern Plewka)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware,comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: EDO RAM on March Amiga?
- Date: 19 Jan 96 21:23:36 +0100
- Message-ID: <xAAvYMD42Dacz9@j-plewka.amtrash.comlink.de>
- References: <wfblanDKzuKL.IC4@netcom.com> <4d8ovm$tp4@coranto.ucs.mun.ca>
- Organization: Amtrash Mailboxsystem
- X-Mailer: MicroDot 1.11beta12 [REGISTERED 00042d]
- X-Gateway: ZCONNECT UH amtrash.comlink.de [UUCPfZ V5.65 U035]
- X-ZC-Telefon: +49 4152 3625
- X-ZC-Post: Tapplock 19, 21502 Geesthacht
-
- bmontgom@morgan.ucs.mun.ca (Byron Montgomerie) -> "Re: EDO RAM on March Amiga?"
- (13.01.1996)
- > Maxwell Daymon (mdaymon@rainbow.rmii.com) wrote:
- >
- > : Someone with an ASUS (256K, pipelined burst sync) said after adding EDO
- > : RAM his computer improved by as much as 10 or 15% in some areas
- > : (including the bench done by Norton SysInfo).
- >
- > Gee, that much eh? :) Interesting to people to like to compare stats but you
- > would never notice it in use. :) Kind of like replacing an 68000 with a 68010.
- > I don't think it warrants the extra dollars.
-
- Exactly my opinion...why special modules for extra money?
- 10-15%...there is a $40 difference in price when comparing 68040-25
- and 68040-33....a little more than 10% faster ;-(
-
- A good design (not 3640) would be more usefull than EDO-RAM ....
- Removing (DMAC) and RAMSEY, too.
-
- / no / J_Plewka@People-S.people.de / AMIGA /
- / MS+ / J_Plewka@Amtrash.comlink.de / is /
- / gAIDS / Plewka_J@Informatik.FH-Hamburg.de / back /
- / +-----------------------------------+ /
- / http://users.informatik.fh-hamburg.de/~plewka_j /
-
-
-
-